Comments on: SPML Under The Spotlight Again? http://blog.talkingidentity.com/2010/02/spml-under-the-spotlight-again.html An Architect's Quest to make sense of the world of Identity and Access Management Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:45:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Hareton http://blog.talkingidentity.com/2010/02/spml-under-the-spotlight-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-345 Hareton Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:04:14 +0000 http://blog.talkingidentity.com/?p=765#comment-345 My experience so far with SPML has been good. Many of us in the industry waited around for the SPML v2 standard. It really was a V2 of the standard adding things like "modify" and "password" capabilities which actually made SPML useful. It's really unfortunate that many of the vendors haven’t adopted it. I dearly want to see SPML as the enabler of loosely-coupled identity architectures. Unfortunately, software vendors usually equate loosely-coupled with “easily replaceable” and the best way to prevent that is to either not support the standard or use custom capabilities that require a specific implementation like many people do according to the interviews i listened to found by <a href="http://www.mp3hunting.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mp3hunting.com</a> SE. My experience so far with SPML has been good. Many of us in the industry waited around for the SPML v2 standard. It really was a V2 of the standard adding things like “modify” and “password” capabilities which actually made SPML useful. It's really unfortunate that many of the vendors haven’t adopted it. I dearly want to see SPML as the enabler of loosely-coupled identity architectures. Unfortunately, software vendors usually equate loosely-coupled with “easily replaceable” and the best way to prevent that is to either not support the standard or use custom capabilities that require a specific implementation like many people do according to the interviews i listened to found by http://www.mp3hunting.com SE.

]]> By: samuel http://blog.talkingidentity.com/2010/02/spml-under-the-spotlight-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-270 samuel Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:04:14 +0000 http://blog.talkingidentity.com/?p=765#comment-270 My experience so far with SPML has been good. Many of us in the industry waited around for the SPML v2 standard. It really was a V2 of the standard adding things like "modify" and "password" capabilities which actually made SPML useful. It's really unfortunate that many of the vendors haven’t adopted it. I dearly want to see SPML as the enabler of loosely-coupled identity architectures. Unfortunately, software vendors usually equate loosely-coupled with “easily replaceable” and the best way to prevent that is to either not support the standard or use custom capabilities that require a specific implementation like many people do according to the interviews i listened to found by <a href="http://www.mp3hunting.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mp3hunting.com</a> SE. My experience so far with SPML has been good. Many of us in the industry waited around for the SPML v2 standard. It really was a V2 of the standard adding things like “modify” and “password” capabilities which actually made SPML useful. It's really unfortunate that many of the vendors haven’t adopted it. I dearly want to see SPML as the enabler of loosely-coupled identity architectures. Unfortunately, software vendors usually equate loosely-coupled with “easily replaceable” and the best way to prevent that is to either not support the standard or use custom capabilities that require a specific implementation like many people do according to the interviews i listened to found by http://www.mp3hunting.com SE.

]]> By: Service Provisioning Markup Language (SPML) Special Interest Group at Catalyst http://blog.talkingidentity.com/2010/02/spml-under-the-spotlight-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-222 Service Provisioning Markup Language (SPML) Special Interest Group at Catalyst Wed, 19 May 2010 19:08:56 +0000 http://blog.talkingidentity.com/?p=765#comment-222 [...] (Standards Based Provisioning and SPML and SPML Use Cases and Profiling Choices), Nishant Kaushik (SPML Under The Spotlight Again?), and Jackson Shaw (SPML – Not dead yet!). We are very pleased to have Anil and Nishant speaking [...] [...] (Standards Based Provisioning and SPML and SPML Use Cases and Profiling Choices), Nishant Kaushik (SPML Under The Spotlight Again?), and Jackson Shaw (SPML – Not dead yet!). We are very pleased to have Anil and Nishant speaking [...]

]]> By: Anil John http://blog.talkingidentity.com/2010/02/spml-under-the-spotlight-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-200 Anil John Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:38:21 +0000 http://blog.talkingidentity.com/?p=765#comment-200 <strong>Standards Based Provisioning and SPML...</strong> ... Standards Based Provisioning and SPML…

…

]]> By: Whither SPML or wither SPML? « Identity Blogger http://blog.talkingidentity.com/2010/02/spml-under-the-spotlight-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-198 Whither SPML or wither SPML? « Identity Blogger Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:52:11 +0000 http://blog.talkingidentity.com/?p=765#comment-198 [...] February 12, 2010 · Leave a Comment Whither SPML or wither SPML? This is the question Mark Diodati asks in his post SPML on Life Support. Ingrid Melve and Nishant Kaushik have follow ups here and here. [...] [...] February 12, 2010 · Leave a Comment Whither SPML or wither SPML? This is the question Mark Diodati asks in his post SPML on Life Support. Ingrid Melve and Nishant Kaushik have follow ups here and here. [...]

]]>